|
Actions:
|
2012-05-08 13:04 AEST by Arthur Barrett - direct support for bisect would possibly require sequential revision numbers (see bug 6012), but
revisions are already pretty sequential on a given branch...
I think a real 'search' mechanism is more useful, see bug 6463
Also the 'example' shown in the bisect documentation (trying to find when a particular line of code was
added) is best solved with using 'cvs annotate'.
Someone has made a very simple bisect here:
http://wingolog.org/archives/2006/01/20/cvs-bisect
We could just include that... |